Can pomegranate juice lower stress levels at work?

A new study shows 'a significant reduction in the level of stress' with 500ml of daily pomegranate. What else would help?

I got properly drenched on the way to the station this morning, then my train was delayed by 20 minutes en route to the office – hardly the most becalming of starts to the week. So having arrived at my desk holding a large, caffeinated cup of coffee, my eye was turned by a study from Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, claiming my stress levels at work could be reduced by drinking more pomegranate juice.

For the study, 60 volunteers were asked to drink 500ml per day of a specific brand of pomegranate juice – Pomegreat Pure – over a two-week period. The research apparently concluded that daily consumption caused "a significant reduction in the level of stress hormone cortisol in saliva and a significant reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in all volunteers."

From reducing the risk of prostate cancer to lowering cholesterol levels, Alzheimer's to arthritis, pomegranates and their many supposed health benefits have been well documented (read my colleague Oliver Thring's affectionate ode to this fascinating fruit here). Much of this research is paid for by juice manufacturers, so it comes as no surprise to find this particular study is funded by Pomegreat Pure.

No doubt consuming more fruit (and perhaps some juices) will help you achieve a healthier lifestyle, and therefore feel better. I've got nothing in particular against Pomegreat Pure, even though it does apparently contain more sugar than Coca-Cola, and the Edinburgh researchers are planning to present some of the results at a conference in Barcelona later this year so maybe there is something to the theory. (Or then again, maybe not.)

But I sometimes wonder if studies like this aren't obscuring a more serious problem. The biggest causes – and therefore moderators – of stress at work are the same as they have always been: hard issues surrounding long, inflexible working hours, lengthy commutes, overwork, low pay, discrimination, the threat of redundancy and so on.

Thankfully there's some welcome discussion about the causes and affects of stress going on in the business world at the moment. Around one in six workers suffer from mental health problems at work according to the charity Mind, which is running an excellent awareness campaign called Taking Care of Business to highlight the problem. Organisations like Acas and the TUC also do a lot of good work in this area.

Apart from a pint of pomegranate juice every day (obviously), what measures would be most likely to bring down your workplace stress levels?

Work & careersFood & drinkHealthHealth & wellbeingGraham Snowdonguardian.co.uk

Waitrose to launch mid-priced health food brand

Grocer tries to steal march on rivals with new range of 'nutrient-packed' products

Waitrose will launch a major new grocery brand this month as the grocer continues to attempt to steal the march on its larger rivals.

The Waitrose "Love Life" brand, which will debut in stores later this month, is the grocer's biggest initiative since the successful "Essential Waitrose" in 2009 and aims to highlight "nutrient-packed" foods. The new brand's logo will also be stamped on other foods across the store to highlight their nutritional value.

Waitrose's marketing director, Rupert Thomas, said it was not a diet brand, but spelled a "new approach to healthy eating". "Usually this area is seen to be about restriction of choice but Love Life is about eating more variety and more of the right things."

The range was developed after customers complained of wanting to eat more wholefoods and less saturated fat. A blueberry, blackcurrant and beetroot smoothie and high-fibre white bread are among the first batch of 270 products that will start to arrive in stores from 30 June. Love Life will also have a quarterly magazine and a section on the retailer's website.

Waitrose uses chef Heston Blumenthal and cookery writer Delia Smith to endorse its products and a new "face" is expected to front the brand, although Thomas declined to comment further.

Thomas said Love Life was a mid-priced brand that would complement the staple goods offered by Essential Waitrose as well as the more indulgent treats available under upmarket banners such as Duchy Originals and the Heston range. The new boss of market leader Tesco recently announced plans to launch new brands – although they will not carry the Tesco name – as a way of grabbing customers' attention, and Waitrose's move will put pressure on rival Marks & Spencer which is also targeting healthy eating.

The Essentials brand helped Waitrose to shake off its reputation for being more expensive than rivals, and it upped the ante last year with a long-term promise to match Tesco prices on 1,000 branded products including everyday items such as Heinz baked beans and Fairy Liquid.

It has continued to enjoy strong growth despite tough conditions in the wider market as food and fuel price inflation eats into consumers' spending power.

Part of the employee-owned John Lewis Partnership, it is expanding aggressively with plans to open 40 stores this year, including the new convenience format Little Waitrose. The warm spring has also helped, with sales up 7.3% last week.

John LewisSupermarketsHealth & wellbeingZoe Woodguardian.co.uk

Rich pickings from living off the fat of the land | Catherine Bennett

We know that diets are inherently flawed, so why do we keep swallowing regimes such as the Dukan?

Have you ever wondered how French women stay so miraculously thin? Me neither. However, given the regularity with which this question now comes up for consideration it may not be an issue we can dodge for much longer. Supposing French women are, indeed, thinner than women from other affluent nations, is it because a) they don't eat too much or b) because so many are followers of the high-protein Dukan diet which promotes itself as "the French medical solution" and "the real reason the French stay thin", catchphrase: "Five million French people can't be wrong"?

You might, pedantically, argue that it has not been unknown, in living memory, for at least five million French people to be less than reliable role models. Even now, the National Front's Marine le Pen remains ahead of Sarkozy in the polls. Again, if French practice provides an irrefutable argument for lifestyle change, we ought, surely, to be emulating their enthusiasm for enemas and nuclear power stations. But in the fat department, Dr Pierre Dukan has, it turns out, made an inspired marketing decision and one that might, in retrospect, help explain the shaky reputation of a fellow protein-gobbler: what does American obesity tell us about the Atkins diet? By declaring his regime the answer to the perennial question about thinness and the French, Dukan has enlisted every non-obese French woman as a testimonial, regardless of whether she has ever been persuaded by his super-scientific approach. "Dear readers, be on your guard," he writes, in the new English edition of his bestseller. "The fight against excess weight has to be carried out by doctors, this is crucial."

Be on your guard, dear readers: Dr Dukan refers to medics of a particular persuasion and not, for example, doctors such as Dr Jean-Michel Cohen, a critic of the Dukan method, whom he is currently suing for libel. Nor does he allude to the doctors working for France's Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire, which last year included his diet in a list of 14 popular regimes which it alleged – Dr Dukan is very sensitive on this point – are ineffective and potentially dangerous to health. Dr Lecerf, who led the study, was satisfied – pace five million French people – that 95% of dieters regain weight as soon as they stop dieting. "Each regime is less effective than the one before and the weight gain afterwards is greater each time."

The five million French can look after themselves: what of our leading British Dukanians, Carole Middleton and Woman's Hour's Jenni Murray, the latter author of a Dukan diary in the Mail? Are they at risk? We note, at any rate, that Mrs Middleton has yet to pose in the accepted manner of triumphant slimmers, inside the gargantuan, elastic-waisted jeans worn by her obese self, alongside the headline: "I cried when I realised I would not fit through the door of the Abbey". As for her fellow Dukanian, following an inspirational loss of three stone, recent lapses involving chips, chocolate, wine and ice-cream now threaten to make Jenni Murray less the pin-up for protein-fuelled transformation than a reminder of this eternal truth: the diet industry is built on the repeated, utterly predictable and necessary failure of its own products.

The peculiar commercial brilliance of high-protein wheezes is that once any initial, dramatic, carb-starved weight loss has given way to normality, as it must for all but the most lonely or obsessed, and to the gradual regaining of weight and fresh breath, its euphoric adherents will have already invested in the required library of diet book, recipe book, lifelong rule book – none of which can add much to what was said, with far greater modesty and concision, by William Banting in his "Letter on Corpulence", published in 1863. "The great charm and comfort of the system," wrote Banting, after he lost 50 lbs on an eccentric but effective protein diet, "is that its affects [sic] are palpable within a week of trial, which creates a natural stimulus to persevere for a few weeks more, when the fact becomes established beyond question." Or not.

To be fair to Jenni Murray, she is not the only intelligent woman publicly to confess to a private habit some people would find embarrassing. Where weight loss is concerned, the most respectable journalism will suspend scepticism, offer promotional services gratis and, in extreme cases, accommodate claims that would, if made in a South African village, prompt reflections on the stubborn nature of superstition. Who would believe, for example, in singing fat away? Step forward a woman introduced in the latest Elle magazine as the Fat Whisperer. "I talk to the fat," she explains. "And I just tell it to go. I listen to the emotion in the cell membrane and I tell the cell which way to move out of the body." And the cell has to go somewhere, right?

It's easy to be cynical, but how else, other than migrating fat cells, do you explain the plight of people who gain without over-eating? For all we know, Eric Pickles is 90% composed of Whisperer clients such as Kate Hudson and Paris Hilton.

Moreover, from a first do no harm perspective, no one could say of Whispering, as Dr Jean-Michel Cohen has said of Dukan, that it causes "veritable alimentary destruction which leads to serious health problems among certain patients such as a strong rise in cholesterol, cardiovascular problems, breast cancer".

Last week, the libel case came to court. In Cohen's defence, his lawyer has cited a study of 5,000 Dukanians, indicating – allegedly – that 80% of those who followed the diet regained their lost weight in four years. Dukan's lawyer says the figure is 40%. The only reason to doubt the purity of Jean-Michel Cohen's intentions as the enemy of "malbouffe" is his connection with another French diet: "Savoir Maigrir avec Jean-Michel Cohen." For Dukan's part, the great carb-hater is not "seeking profit or fame". He wants, says his lawyer, to bring people "slimming methods capable of bringing them ways of fighting obesity for their whole life".

I am no doctor, but if that is so would not his profits be best dedicated to nutritional education, so women won't fall for regimes like the frankfurter diet recently – and mischievously – awarded the imprimatur of the British Heart Foundation? A BHF dietician explained that a dinner of two frankfurters, half a cup of carrots, a cup of broccoli or cabbage followed by vanilla ice-cream "lacks a number of nutrients we need to stay healthy". How could anyone fall for it? Possibly because it looked so varied after two weeks dining, in the Dukan manner approved by Grazia, Carole and the Daily Mail, on a couple of slices of meat.

Why are French women so thin? From sprinting away from Dominique Strauss-Kahn still has to be the most plausible explanation.

FoodFood safetyFood & drinkHealth & wellbeingCatherine Bennettguardian.co.uk

E coli outbreak: UK health agency issues advice to public

Dr Bob Adak from the Health Protection Agency explains who is at risk from the new strain of E coli and how to avoid infection

The source of this outbreak has not yet been identified by the German authorities so we might see further cases in the UK in people who have recently spent time in Germany (the incubation period for this illness is 8-14 days). That is why the Health Protection Agency is advising anyone visiting Germany to avoid eating lettuce, cucumber and tomatoes, and to seek urgent medical advice if they have illness and bloody diarrhoea within two weeks of being there.

All of the cases in the UK are associated with recent travel to Germany. There have been no reports of transmission of the infection in this country and there is no evidence that any food is contaminated with this strain of E coli in the UK.

E coli bacteria usually cause diarrhoea which settles within seven days without treatment. There are many strains of the infection. Most people normally carry harmless strains of E coli in their intestine. Both the harmless strains and those that cause diarrhoea are acquired primarily through ingestion of contaminated food or water. Person-to-person and animal-to-human transmission is through the oral-faecal route.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), which we have seen cases of in the current outbreak, is a serious complication from this particular strain that affects the blood, kidneys and, in severe cases, the central nervous system. It is a serious illness that requires treatment in hospital and can be fatal.

The number of severe cases of HUS that have occurred in a short period is very unusual and the affected age groups are not typical: HUS is a more common complication from E coli infection in children. The reason for this is not yet known. The World Health Organisation is currently carrying out genetic sequencing of the bacterium, which will teach us more about this particular strain.

Good hygiene is very important in preventing person-to person spread and small children should be supervised with hand-washing after using the toilet and before eating.

Dr Bob Adak is head of gastroenterology at the Health Protection Agency

MicrobiologyInfectious diseasesMedical researchE coliFood safetyHealthHealth & wellbeingguardian.co.uk

Why are more women than men affected by the E coli outbreak?

Around three-quarters of 1,800 E coli infections and at least 13 of the 19 who have died have been women. Why?

The vegetables suspected to be at the centre of the E coli outbreak are cucumbers, lettuce and tomatoes: all parts of a healthy diet. Ironically, this may also explain why young women seem to be disproportionately affected by the bug.

In the vast majority of outbreaks, most victims are the elderly or children, whose immune systems may be either weak or underdeveloped. But in the case of the German E coli strain, around three-quarters of the 1,800 infections and at least 13 of the 19 who have died so far have been adult women.

Experts are unclear why. Bob Adak, head of the UK Health Protection Agency's food section, said: "We can't say with complete certainty why women have been disproportionately affected, but in previous outbreaks around the world associated with salad vegetables we have seen women and adults more severely affected than men and children, so it's possible that this could be an indicator of food preference."

The idea that the preponderance of women could simply be the result of generally better diets among young women was supported by Stephen Smith, a clinical microbiologist at Trinity College, Dublin. He speculated that "it may be reflective of their healthier lifestyle - ie consuming more salad vegetables."

Another possibility is that the specific strain spreading from Germany finds something about women's guts more hospitable. This selective phenomenon would not be unprecedented since many bugs disproportionately affect people from different races or who come from particular geographical regions.

Infectious diseasesMicrobiologyMedical researchE coliFood safetyHealthHealth & wellbeingFood & drinkAlok Jhaguardian.co.uk

This column will change your life: The Golden Rule of Triggers | Oliver Burkeman

Before you press send, take a deep breath, says

The "fight-or-flight response" is one of those ideas self-help authors have wrenched with gusto out of its scientific context, with predictably messy results. The worst example of this happened to quantum physics (visit quantumjumping.com for exciting tips on how to use the theory of multiple universes "to pick up new skills… like painting [or] photography"). By contrast, and however much it's been distorted, fight-or-flight remains a useful way of seeing our tendency to react like startled animals when faced by stress. Speaking broadly, the prefrontal cortex – the reflective part of the brain – shuts down and the amygdala, the lizard brain, which is responsible for our animal instincts, takes over. Steeled for combat or readying for escape, we switch into "survival mode" – useful for running away from predators, but a misery-inducing approach to the manifold minor stresses of modern life.

There's an element of fight-or-flight involved, arguably, not only in angry encounters, but whenever we find ourselves doing things we "know" we shouldn't. Impulse buying, procrastination and compulsive eating can all

Our green spaces are priceless | Nicholas Milton

The government's attempt to put a monetary value on nature threatens the existence of our remaining parks and playing fields

How much is your local park, playing field, allotment or nature reserve worth to you? What price would you put on hearing the rich, varied and flute like song of a blackbird while walking in the countryside? Or the view of a canal or river from your living room window?

According to the government's National Ecosystem Assessment, looking after all the UK's green spaces is worth the sum of £30bn a year to the economy. But to someone who has worked in the environmental movement for more than 20 years – and I expect many of the 5 million people who are members of conservation organisations – they are all priceless.

Putting a monetary value on the natural environment, as the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) seeks to do, may fit well with the government's world view that everything has a price but it also smacks of Oscar Wilde's maxim that they know the price of everything and the value of nothing. Treating nature this way will be a disaster for the environment because it means that unscrupulous developers or governments with big deficits can now argue even more vigorously that economic and social gains are worth more than environmental ones. Far from protecting the natural environment it will provide the economic justification for why many more planning applications and major infrastructure projects should go ahead at the expense of our parks, playing fields, allotments and nature reserves.

It also shows that the government seems to have learnt nothing from the debacle of trying to sell off our national forests. Six months ago they valued England's state-owned forests at between just £140m and £250m. However, they soon found out to their cost that many of us thought they were priceless. If over half a million of us signed a petition against selling off our forests, why do they now think that putting a monetary value all our green spaces is something that will win them support?

The whole process becomes even more meaningless when you try to compare the £30bn figure with other economic statistics. Take the UK government's national debt, which at the end of last year was more than £1,105bn or more than 36 times the value credited to our green spaces. That figure has been used to push through the biggest cut in environment spending in generations, including a cut of nearly a third in the budget of Defra. In the case of our green spaces, giving them a monetary value will be used as yet another reason to cut their funding or concrete over what remains of our natural environment. That is because local authorities, planners and governments will always attach a higher economic importance to providing services and building houses or roads than conserving green spaces or wildlife habitats.

Next week the government will launch its much vaunted natural environment white paper. For many environmentalists it will be a chance to establish some environmental credibility after a series of bad decisions and disappointments, from the forestry sell-off to the green investment bank. Central to that will be an understanding that we need to protect the environment because it sustains life on earth and is integral to our wellbeing as a society, not because it's worth a paltry £30bn.

Green economyHealth & wellbeingGreen politicsNicholas Miltonguardian.co.uk

UK green spaces worth at least £30bn a year in health and welfare, report finds

First ever full assessment of the UK's natural assets quantifies the benefits – and warns of the cost of failing to protect them

• Damian Carrington: Putting a price on nature can't be worse than giving it all away for free

Looking after the UK's green spaces better is worth at least £30bn a year in health and welfare benefits, according to the first ever full assessment of the UK's natural environment.

Around one-third of the UK's natural assets – including green spaces, rivers, wetlands and important wildlife habitats – are in danger of being lost to development or degraded through neglect. The report by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) found "a marked decline" in urban green space, with 10,000 playing fields sold off between 1979 and 1997, while only 10% of the UK's allotments remain.

The health benefits of living with a view of a green space are worth up to £300 per person per year, in part by providing areas for people to exercise but also because simply looking at nature lifts people's spirits, according to scientific research. Living close to rivers, coasts and wetlands is also a boon – the benefits to residents are about £1.3bn a year.

But these benefits are rarely taken into account when decisions are made about granting permission for building and other development, and in selling off green spaces such as playing fields.

This is the first time the benefits that the UK gains from its natural ecosystems have been quantified and a monetary value put on them. The National Ecosystem Assessment shows that the value of the UK's natural landscape extends far beyond farming.

Bob Watson, chief scientific adviser to Defra and co-author of the report, said the assessment should be used to shape government policy at the national and local level. "Putting a value on these natural services enables them to be incorporated into policy in the same way that other factors are. We can't persist in thinking of these things as free."

"We have to become much better at managing our ecosystems," he said.

If the UK's ecosystems are properly cared for, they could add an extra £30bn a year to the UK's economy; if they are neglected, the economic cost would be more than £20bn a year, the report found. Inland wetlands, for instance, are worth £1.5bn a year in improving water quality alone, and pollinators such as bees are worth at least £430m a year to agriculture.

Although the report's authors were reluctant to put a single figure on the value of the natural environment, the report shows it runs into hundreds of billions of pounds.

"Green spaces and blue spaces [such as rivers] have an incredible value. Urban planners need to recognise that value," said Prof Ian Bateman, co-author of the report.

Caroline Spelman, secretary of state for the environment, said: "The assessment is a vital step forward in our ability to understand the true value of nature and how to sustain the benefits it gives us. I want our children to be the first generation to leave the natural environment in a better state than it was left to them."

However, the government has been accused of failing to look after the UK's natural environment, by classifying dozens of environmental and countryside regulations as "red tape" that may be axed as part of its promised "bonfire of regulations".

Within the next few weeks, the government is expected to issue its promised natural environment white paper, which will draw on the ecosystem assessment. The white paper is expected to include measures to protect areas of beauty and scientific interest, as well as proposals on green spaces.

Green economyHealthHealth & wellbeingEconomicsFiona Harveyguardian.co.uk

The inside track … on paddling

Wear flip-flops in the sea if you want to avoid an excruciating encounter with the poisonous weever fish

A quick splash at the water's edge might seem like the best way to cool your tired feet when the sun's out – but chiropodist Fred Beaumont warns that if you go barefoot, it's something you could live to regret. "I always wear flip-flops when paddling, and tell my patients to do the same," he says. "A few years ago, I was bitten [see footnote] by a weever fish in shallow water – the pain was excruciating, and I couldn't run for a

Brain haemorrhage: How climbing mountains saved me

The fact that mountain-climbing GP Alistair Sutcliffe had spent time at low-oxygen altitude levels trained his brain to

Hey. want say full about DL flyers here u may do it now